John McCain’s lie about Obama’s free trade stance

During a September 15, 2008 interview Jorge Ramos for Univision, John McCain said:

“So, the point is, I’m for free trade and opening these markets, and improving the lives of the people of Mexico and our hemisphere, so they don’t have to come to the United States of America. Senator Obama wants to close those markets, he is against every, literally every free trade agreement.”

On June 26, 2006 Senator Obama voted for the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement

On May 23, 2008 in Miami Obama said:

“Like Central America’s bishops, I opposed CAFTA [the Central American Free Trade Agreement] because the needs of workers were not adequately addressed. I supported the Peru Free Trade Agreement because there were binding labor and environmental provisions. That’s the kind of trade we need – trade that lifts up workers, not just a corporate bottom line.”

We don’t dispute that Obama’s support of “free trade” is very different than McCain’s, but Senator McCain’s assertion that Obama is literally against every free trade agreement is clearly a lie.

Tags:

7 Responses to “John McCain’s lie about Obama’s free trade stance”

  1. John McCain Says:

    Man, I need to stop using the word “literally”. Hopefully the American people will see past my choice of phrases so I can represent them in the White House.

  2. Bob F Says:

    But couldn’t you say that binding Labor and Environmental provisions make it not Free trade. Shouldn’t ‘Free’ Trade be Free?

  3. Peter Centofante Says:

    Hey Bob - the argument about free trade agreements being actual “free” trade is a good one, but doesn’t affect the particular untrue mccain statement: “he is against every, literally every free trade agreement”

  4. eric Says:

    Free trade means free of restricting tariffs and sanctions. Nobody advocates for free trade as in free beer.

  5. Bob F Says:

    Eric that’s the point I’m trying to make. That by imposing “binding Labor and Enviromental provisions’ it’s no longer a free trade agreement because there are ‘binding’ provisions. I was never advocating free beer although it might be nice.

  6. Vina Woodring Says:

    And you covered that pretty well didn’t you?

  7. Rodrigo Missildine Says:

    Thanks for ones marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you could be a great author.I will always bookmark your blog and definitely will come back down the road. I want to encourage you continue your great writing, have a nice afternoon!

Leave a Reply

Help evaluate and research "lie leads"

All lie leads >